STROUD MP Simon Opher has revealed why he voted with the government as Sir Keir Starmer saw off a backbench rebellion over plans to cut the winter fuel allowance.
MPs voted 348 to 228 to axe the payment for all but the country’s poorest pensioners, rejecting a Tory bid for the 'controversial' policy to be blocked.
Stroud MP Simon Opher was one of the 348 voters having previously (along with 48 other members) signed an Early Day Motion that expressed concerns over the new Social Fund Winter Fuel Payment regulations.
Only one Labour backbencher, Jon Trickett, today opposed the Government in supporting the Conservative motion, while 53 including seven ministers had no vote recorded.
Dr Opher said: "Yesterday afternoon I voted with the government to introduce means testing on the Winter Fuel Payment (WFP).
"It was a universal benefit introduced by the last Labour government to solve a particular issue.
"Today, our government faces a host of other problems, not the least of which is the financial black hole left by the Tories.
"This is a real and urgent problem that we cannot wish away.
"The WFP goes to many people who really do not need it.
"But I am very aware that it is essential for many others.
"I made my concerns about the clear ever since the policy was first announced, especially about the cut off point, and the fact that there was no phasing or tapering for those just above the threshold.
!I have been in more or less constant discussion with ministers and others over the last few days.
"As a result, my understanding is that, ahead of the budget, my primary concerns will be addressed - hence my support yesterday.
"We continue to need a comprehensive strategy to tackle fuel poverty, health inequality and low incomes among older people.
"I will press for that, and to ensure that the implementation of the policy does indeed reflect the substantive nature of the assurances I have been given.
"I support the government’s work sorting out the mess left by the Tories.
"It has to be done.
"But I will continue to make sure that those who really need our support get the protections and respect they deserve."
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel