Channel 4’s new reality TV show, The Jury: Murder Trial, is getting a lot of attention. I hope I am not alone in being really uneasy about its premise that juries are dodgy.
This is a show: the ‘jurors’ have been carefully chosen by the programme-makers to provide entertainment.
They do not reflect the cross-section that comes from a genuinely random selection process.
Juries are not dodgy: twelve ordinary people, selected at random, are a far more reliable source of justice than a judge, probably privately educated, white and middle-aged or elderly.
A judge is qualified to advise on the law but our legal system correctly leaves weighing the evidence and deciding on a verdict to the jury.
It is no surprise that this show with its rigged jury, has emerged now, given that for the last two years politicians have been fuming about juries ‘letting off’ protesters.
They may be all for lock-em-up, but the rest of us ‘ordinary people’ are not.
Yours sincerely
David Lambert
Stroud
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel